Since the return of democracy in 1999, the link between party financing and corruption in Nigeria has become more like the Siamese twins. Very difficult to separate. They cut across political divides, whether perceived as progressives or conservatives. Perhaps, this may be the reason why people of integrity, technocrats, professionals, and retired civil servants appear to be distancing themselves from party politics, as they do not see it as an avenue through which they can make their contributions to nation-building because of the presumption that politics is for those who have the wherewithal other than integrity and expertise.
No doubt, political parties play pivotal roles as institutions in the advancement of any nation, but it becomes worrisome how party politics has become an avenue to squander public resources.
Electoral success ought to be influenced by ideas, values and traits but the opposite is the case in Nigeria, as party tickets are well-competed for among those with intimidating pockets. At the end, the highest bidder among the moneybags would fly the party’s flag during elections.
To check its excesses, as statutorily stipulated, Sections 222 – 229 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution (as amended) provide rules and regulations on the operations of political parties, just as Sections 225 and 226 clearly affirm the powers of INEC, the country’s electoral body, to monitor, inquire into and assess campaign finances, and a party’s source of and management of funds.
Also, Section 228 expressly provides sanctions regarding party finance and campaign finance and provides the National Assembly with statutory powers in this regard.
The extant 2010 Electoral Act, as amended, pegs spending limits as follows: Presidential election – N1bn; Governorship- N200m, Senatorial – N40m, House of Representatives candidate – N20m, and House of Assembly – N10m. Section 92 (3) of this enabling law also requires every political party to submit, six months after every election, an audited revenue and expenditure report of the party, failing which penalties are stipulated.
However, going by the exclusive investigation conducted by Premium Times, it was disclosed that the Peoples Democratic Party, spent N2.9bn while the All Progressives Party spent N4.8bn on the hotly-contested polls.
The APC’s audit report was filed by Mai-Alheri and Co. who disclosed that the party derived its 2015 income from the sale of nomination forms which generated N329.5m, and donations and gifts which generated N275m.
The APC also spent N296.3m on administration; N56.5m on repairs and maintenance; N485,800m on welfare, and N15.4 million on financial charges.
The audit noted that while the party spent N2.9bn on the 2015 polls, it generated only N604.5m in the same calendar year, leaving a deficit of N2.3bn. The party disclosed that this was covered by its surplus from 2014 when it earned about N6.4bn and spent only N4bn.
The party also named some fixed assets it acquired including office equipment at N5.1m, the APC Data Centre equipment at N300,000; furniture and fittings at N6.8m; motor vehicles at N20m and library books at N3.4 million, totalling about N35.8 million.
According to the PDP’s audit report, which was executed by Paul Akinade Adebimpe and Co., the party’s income in 2015 was derived from donations and levies totalling N200m and other incomes that amounted to N599.2m.
While the party spent N4.8bn on the 2015 elections, it also spent N1.7bn on administration; N2.8bn on its national secretariat and N54m on other financial expenses.
The party had a surplus of N9.4bn from 2014, as it spent only N3.6bn from the N13bn it reportedly earned.
External auditors working for INEC noted that the APC’s internal audit system was not properly in place, making it difficult to confidently establish the party’s full financial position. The party was also alleged to not possess proper records of fixed assets while also manually executing financial transactions.
Also, like the APC, INEC’s auditors noted the PDP’s failure to prepare a budget for the period under review, an act that could leave room for excessive spending by the party. The party was also noted to manually record financial transactions, a process that could easily lead to errors. The party’s fixed asset register was also not maintained for the period under review.
With the foregoing events, it is very important for INEC to tighten the noose by ensuring decency in financial expenditures before, during and after campaigns.
The sanity of the electoral system will be better guaranteed with lesser funds for circulation during the campaigns, as this would encourage the participation of persons with leadership capacity in the electoral process.
If well-enacted, the emerging scenario of two parties in Nigeria would be clipped with the implementation of the laws guiding the money to be spent during campaigns.
Strangely, successive governments have found a way to preach against excessive campaign funding when they are not in government but are usually guilty whenever they emerge as government officials.
We must also be wary of encouraging corruption if we fail in the regulation of this very important policy. In the end, we should ask; must we all be saints before campaigns and refuse to respect the laws during campaigns?
- Alabidun Abdulrahman
Wuye, Abuja
alabidungoldenson@gmail.com
